1996 Hunter 290 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1996 Hunter 290 1996 Hunter 290
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Hunter 290 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
Manufacturer Hunter Wauquiez
Year 1996–2000 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Glenn Henderson Jean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.47 m (24.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,493 kg (7,701 lbs) 4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.9 m² (419 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 0.91m longer than the 1996 Hunter 290. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Hunter 290 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Hunter 290 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Hunter 290 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Hunter 290 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS