1978 Bristol 40 vs 1980 Contest 33 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 401980 Contest 33
General
ManufacturerBristolContest
Year1978–19831980–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerTed HoodDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
1980 Contest 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
1980 Contest 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
1980 Contest 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
1980 Contest 33
22.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and 1980 Contest 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The 1980 Contest 33 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1980 Contest 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1978 Bristol 40 is 2.13m longer than the 1980 Contest 33. The 1978 Bristol 40 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 1980 Contest 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Bristol 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 1980 Contest 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1980 Contest 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Bristol 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Bristol 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · 1980 Contest 33