Hanse 400 vs 1980 Contest 33 — Comparison

Hanse 400
VS
1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4001980 Contest 33
General
ManufacturerHanseContest
Year2002–20061980–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyNetherlands
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA12.10 m (39.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.60 m (34.8 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.80 m (12.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1980 Contest 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1980 Contest 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1980 Contest 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1980 Contest 33
22.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1980 Contest 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1980 Contest 33 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1980 Contest 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.04m longer than the 1980 Contest 33. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1980 Contest 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1980 Contest 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1980 Contest 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Contest 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 1980 Contest 33