1968 Alberg 35 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

1968 Alberg 35 1968 Alberg 35
VS
Hanse 400 Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1968 Alberg 35 Hanse 400
General
Manufacturer Various Hanse
Year 1968–1978 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Carl Alberg judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 43.0 m² (463 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Alberg 35
14.12
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Alberg 35
41.67
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Alberg 35
0.66
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Alberg 35
27.81
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Alberg 35 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Alberg 35 is a classic design by Various from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1968 Alberg 35 was penned by Carl Alberg. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1968 Alberg 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 1.43m longer than the 1968 Alberg 35. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Alberg 35 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Alberg 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1968 Alberg 35 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Alberg 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Alberg 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS