2001 Nautor Swan 42 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

2001 Nautor Swan 42 2001 Nautor Swan 42
VS
Hanse 400 Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2001 Nautor Swan 42 Hanse 400
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Hanse
Year 2001–2006 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Germany
Designer German Frers judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.80 m (42.0 ft) 12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam 3.96 m (13.0 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,300 kg (20,503 lbs) 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 82.0 m² (883 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 160 L (42.3 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
18.84
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
40.86
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
0.75
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
17.22
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 was penned by German Frers. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is 0.70m longer than the Hanse 400. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.84 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS