1978 Pearson 30 vs 1979 O'Day 28 — Comparison

1978 Pearson 301978 Pearson 30
VS
1979 O'Day 281979 O'Day 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Pearson 301979 O'Day 28
General
ManufacturerPearsonO'Day
Year1978–19831979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.3 m² (423 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Pearson 30
16.91
1979 O'Day 28
16.16
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Pearson 30
41.25
1979 O'Day 28
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Pearson 30
0.79
1979 O'Day 28
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Pearson 30
19.87
1979 O'Day 28
18.69

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Pearson 30 and 1979 O'Day 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1979 O'Day 28 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The 1979 O'Day 28 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1979 O'Day 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1978 Pearson 30 is 0.61m longer than the 1979 O'Day 28. The 1978 Pearson 30 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The 1979 O'Day 28, with an SA/D of 16.16 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 Pearson 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1979 O'Day 28 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 40.0% for the 1979 O'Day 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 O'Day 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Pearson 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Pearson 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Pearson 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Pearson 30 · 1979 O'Day 28