1979 Islander 36 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1979 Islander 361979 Islander 36
VS
1972 Ranger 291972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Islander 361972 Ranger 29
General
ManufacturerIslanderRanger
Year1979–19851972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerAlan GurneyGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.2 m² (583 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Islander 36
16.06
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Islander 36
42.87
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Islander 36
0.71
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Islander 36
22.32
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Islander 36 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Islander 36 is a 1970s design by Islander from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1979 Islander 36 was penned by Alan Gurney. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1979 Islander 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1979 Islander 36 is 2.13m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1979 Islander 36 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Islander 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.06 and 54.2 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Islander 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1979 Islander 36 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Islander 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Islander 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Islander 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Islander 36 · 1972 Ranger 29