1979 Islander 36 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1979 Islander 361979 Islander 36
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Islander 36Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerIslanderHunter
Year1979–19851998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerAlan GurneyGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.2 m² (583 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Islander 36
16.06
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Islander 36
42.87
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Islander 36
0.71
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Islander 36
22.32
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Islander 36 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Islander 36 is a 1970s design by Islander from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1979 Islander 36 was penned by Alan Gurney. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1979 Islander 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1979 Islander 36 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1979 Islander 36 displaces approximately 146% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Islander 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.06 and 54.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Islander 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1979 Islander 36 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Islander 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Islander 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Islander 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Islander 36 · Hunter 280