1979 Pearson 37 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Pearson 371982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerPearsonFreedom
Year1979–19851982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA11.28 m (37.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity190 L (50.2 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Pearson 37
24.10
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Pearson 37 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1979 Pearson 37 was penned by William Shaw. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1979 Pearson 37 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 2.75m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 191% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Pearson 37 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Pearson 37 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Pearson 37 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Pearson 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Pearson 37 · 1982 Freedom 28