1979 Peterson 44 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1979 Peterson 44
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Peterson 442000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerPetersonSabre
Year1979–19862000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerDoug PetersonJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA13.41 m (44.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.13 m (7.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,979 kg (22,000 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity265 L (70.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Peterson 44
17.31
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Peterson 44
40.91
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Peterson 44
0.72
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Peterson 44
19.21
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Peterson 44 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Peterson 44 is a 1970s design by Peterson from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1979 Peterson 44 was penned by Doug Peterson. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1979 Peterson 44 measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1979 Peterson 44 is 1.83m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 1979 Peterson 44 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Peterson 44 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1979 Peterson 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Peterson 44 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1979 Peterson 44 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Peterson 44 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1979 Peterson 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Peterson 44 · 2000 Sabre 386