Hanse 400 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 400 | 2000 Sabre 386 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Sabre |
| Year | 2002–2006 | 2000–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.60 m (34.8 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 29 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 280 L (74.0 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 400 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.52m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 400 · 2000 Sabre 386