Catalina 42 MkII vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 42 MkII | 2000 Sabre 386 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Sabre |
| Year | 2003–2009 | 2000–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.80 m (42.0 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 11.10 m (36.4 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 76.0 m² (818 ft²) | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 152 L (40.2 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 42 MkII and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 42 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the Catalina 42 MkII measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Catalina 42 MkII is 1.22m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The Catalina 42 MkII displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 42 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 42 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 42 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 42 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 42 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 42 MkII · 2000 Sabre 386