2001 Nautor Swan 42 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2001 Nautor Swan 42 2001 Nautor Swan 42
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2001 Nautor Swan 42 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Sabre
Year 2001–2006 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland USA
Designer German Frers Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 12.80 m (42.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.96 m (13.0 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,300 kg (20,503 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 82.0 m² (883 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 160 L (42.3 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
18.84
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
40.86
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
0.75
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Nautor Swan 42
17.22
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 was penned by German Frers. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is 1.22m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.84 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS