1992 Contest 42 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1992 Contest 421992 Contest 42
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 Contest 422000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerContestSabre
Year1992–20022000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,400 kg (22,928 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area76.0 m² (818 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 Contest 42
16.20
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 Contest 42
40.38
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 Contest 42
0.71
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 Contest 42
21.49
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 Contest 42 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 Contest 42 is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1992 Contest 42 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1992 Contest 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1992 Contest 42 is 1.22m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 1992 Contest 42 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 Contest 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 Contest 42 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1992 Contest 42 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 Contest 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Contest 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 Contest 42 · 2000 Sabre 386