1980 Contest 33 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Contest 331979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerContestWesterly
Year1980–19901979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUK
DesignerDick ZaalEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Contest 33
14.90
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Contest 33
40.38
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Contest 33
0.74
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Contest 33
22.02
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Contest 33 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1980 Contest 33 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1980 Contest 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Contest 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 Contest 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Contest 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Contest 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Contest 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Contest 33 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar