1980 CS 33 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 331979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsCal
Year1980–19871979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerRay WallBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 1.83m longer than the 1980 CS 33. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Cal 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Cal 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · 1979 Cal 39