1980 CS 33 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 33Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsHunter
Year1980–19872000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerRay WallGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · Hunter 31