1991 Najad 373 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

1991 Najad 373
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Najad 373Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerNajadHunter
Year1991–20022000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.28 m (37.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.99 m (29.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.8 m² (654 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Najad 373
15.83
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Najad 373
41.17
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Najad 373
0.70
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Najad 373
24.12
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Najad 373 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Najad 373 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1991 Najad 373 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1991 Najad 373 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1991 Najad 373 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1991 Najad 373 displaces approximately 89% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Najad 373 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Najad 373 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1991 Najad 373 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Najad 373 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Najad 373 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Najad 373 · Hunter 31