1981 Pearson 36 vs 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 361986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
General
ManufacturerPearsonHallberg-Rassy
Year1981–19851986–1995
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerWilliam ShawGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.20 m (33.5 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
16.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
21.84

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is a 1980s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is 2.13m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, with an SA/D of 16.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has a comfort ratio of 21.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 40.0% for the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F