1981 Pearson 36 vs Catalina 445 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
Catalina 445

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 36Catalina 445
General
ManufacturerPearsonCatalina
Year1981–19852016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)13.56 m (44.5 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)4.17 m (13.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)84.0 m² (904 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)379 L (100.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
Catalina 445
16.91
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
Catalina 445
38.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
Catalina 445
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
Catalina 445
16.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and Catalina 445 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 445 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 445 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Catalina 445 at 13.56m (44.5ft) with a 4.17m beam. The Catalina 445 is 2.89m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The Catalina 445 displaces approximately 85% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 445, with an SA/D of 16.91 and 84.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 445 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Catalina 445 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 38.0% for the Catalina 445, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 445 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 445 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · Catalina 445