1981 Pearson 36 vs 1993 Najad 360 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
1993 Najad 3601993 Najad 360

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 361993 Najad 360
General
ManufacturerPearsonNajad
Year1981–19851993–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerWilliam ShawJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1993 Najad 360
16.04
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1993 Najad 360
41.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1993 Najad 360
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1993 Najad 360
20.68

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1993 Najad 360 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1993 Najad 360 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1993 Najad 360 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1993 Najad 360 is 0.30m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The 1993 Najad 360 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1993 Najad 360, with an SA/D of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1993 Najad 360 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1993 Najad 360 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1993 Najad 360 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Najad 360 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1993 Najad 360 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 1993 Najad 360