1981 Pearson 36 vs Catalina 42 MkII — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
Catalina 42 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 36Catalina 42 MkII
General
ManufacturerPearsonCatalina
Year1981–19852003–2009
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)11.10 m (36.4 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)303 L (80.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
Catalina 42 MkII
17.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
Catalina 42 MkII
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
Catalina 42 MkII
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
Catalina 42 MkII
17.36

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and Catalina 42 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 42 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Catalina 42 MkII at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Catalina 42 MkII is 2.13m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The Catalina 42 MkII displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 42 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 42 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Catalina 42 MkII has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 42 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L water and 152L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 42 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · Catalina 42 MkII