1981 Pearson 36 vs Hanse 375 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
Hanse 375

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 36Hanse 375
General
ManufacturerPearsonHanse
Year1981–19852009–2015
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerWilliam Shawjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.35 m (37.2 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.05 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.65 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
Hanse 375
17.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
Hanse 375
30.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
Hanse 375
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
Hanse 375
17.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and Hanse 375 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Hanse 375 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The Hanse 375 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 375 at 11.35m (37.2ft) with a 3.65m beam. The Hanse 375 is 0.68m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 375, with an SA/D of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 375 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 30.7% for the Hanse 375, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 375 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · Hanse 375