1982 Hunter 34 vs 1985 Irwin 38 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
1985 Irwin 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 341985 Irwin 38
General
ManufacturerHunterIrwin
Year1982–19881985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
1985 Irwin 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
1985 Irwin 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
1985 Irwin 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
1985 Irwin 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 1985 Irwin 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1985 Irwin 38 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1985 Irwin 38 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1985 Irwin 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1985 Irwin 38 is 1.22m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The 1985 Irwin 38 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1985 Irwin 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Hunter 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1985 Irwin 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 42.4% for the 1985 Irwin 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1985 Irwin 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Irwin 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Hunter 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · 1985 Irwin 38