1982 Hunter 34 vs 1990 Westerly Oceanquest — Comparison

1982 Hunter 34 1982 Hunter 34
VS
1990 Westerly Oceanquest 1990 Westerly Oceanquest

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Hunter 34 1990 Westerly Oceanquest
General
Manufacturer Hunter Westerly
Year 1982–1988 1990–1996
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Hunter Design Team Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.2 m² (540 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 23 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 152 L (40.2 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
14.32
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
20.14

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 1990 Westerly Oceanquest represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest is 0.31m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest, with an SA/D of 14.32 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 Hunter 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 38.5% for the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Hunter 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS