1996 Najad 380 vs 1990 Westerly Oceanquest — Comparison

1996 Najad 380 1996 Najad 380
VS
1990 Westerly Oceanquest 1990 Westerly Oceanquest

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Najad 380 1990 Westerly Oceanquest
General
Manufacturer Najad Westerly
Year 1996–2006 1990–1996
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden UK
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL 9.50 m (31.2 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.0 m² (667 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 23 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 260 L (68.7 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
14.32
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
1990 Westerly Oceanquest
20.14

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 1990 Westerly Oceanquest represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.88m longer than the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest, with an SA/D of 14.32 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 38.5% for the 1990 Westerly Oceanquest, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Westerly Oceanquest offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS