1996 Najad 380 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1996 Najad 380 1996 Najad 380
VS
1995 Feeling 39 1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Najad 380 1995 Feeling 39
General
Manufacturer Najad Feeling
Year 1996–2006 1995–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden France
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL 9.50 m (31.2 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.0 m² (667 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 260 L (68.7 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 0.25m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS