1995 Feeling 39 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1995 Feeling 39 1995 Feeling 39
VS
1983 Pearson 31 1983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1995 Feeling 39 1983 Pearson 31
General
Manufacturer Feeling Pearson
Year 1995–2003 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Philippe Harlé William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 11.80 m (38.7 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam 3.78 m (12.4 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 66.0 m² (710 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Feeling 39
18.21
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Feeling 39 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1995 Feeling 39 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1995 Feeling 39 measures 11.80m (38.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.78m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.35m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Feeling 39 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Feeling 39 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Feeling 39 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS