1982 Hunter 34 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 341995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerHunterFeeling
Year1982–19881995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerHunter Design TeamPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.44m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · 1995 Feeling 39