1994 J/105 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/1051995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsFeeling
Year1994–20081995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerRod JohnstonePhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.28m longer than the 1994 J/105. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · 1995 Feeling 39