1982 Hunter 34 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 342010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerHunterElan
Year1982–19882010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerHunter Design TeamRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Hunter 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · 2010 Elan 340