1982 Hunter 34 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 342014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerHunterElan
Year1982–19882014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerHunter Design TeamRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 1.71m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · 2014 Elan 400