1982 Hunter 34 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 34 1982 Hunter 34
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Hunter 34 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
Manufacturer Hunter Beneteau
Year 1982–1988 2013
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Hunter Design Team VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.2 m² (540 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 20 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 152 L (40.2 gal) 40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 2
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1982 Hunter 34 is 0.26m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1982 Hunter 34 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Hunter 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS