1982 Island Packet 31 vs 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 — Comparison

1982 Island Packet 31 1982 Island Packet 31
VS
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Island Packet 31 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
General
Manufacturer Island Packet Pacific Seacraft
Year 1982–1994 1980–2007
Type Cutter Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer Bob Johnson William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 2.54 m (8.3 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.2 m² (530 ft²) 23.5 m² (253 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 25 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 3
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Island Packet 31
15.32
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
12.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Island Packet 31
41.53
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Island Packet 31
0.74
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Island Packet 31
25.11
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
28.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Island Packet 31 and 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1982 Island Packet 31 is a 1980s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1982 Island Packet 31 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1982 Island Packet 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.54m beam. The 1982 Island Packet 31 is 2.13m longer than the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24. The 1982 Island Packet 31 displaces approximately 136% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Island Packet 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.32 and 49.2 m² of sail area. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, with an SA/D of 12.98 and 23.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 Island Packet 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Island Packet 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 has a comfort ratio of 28.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1982 Island Packet 31 and 41.8% for the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Island Packet 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Island Packet 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Island Packet 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS