1988 Contest 38 vs 1982 Island Packet 31 — Comparison

1988 Contest 38 1988 Contest 38
VS
1982 Island Packet 31 1982 Island Packet 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Contest 38 1982 Island Packet 31
General
Manufacturer Contest Island Packet
Year 1988–1996 1982–1994
Type Sloop Cutter
Country Netherlands USA
Designer Dick Zaal Bob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.47 m (11.4 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 61.5 m² (662 ft²) 49.2 m² (530 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
1982 Island Packet 31
15.32
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
1982 Island Packet 31
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
1982 Island Packet 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
1982 Island Packet 31
25.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and 1982 Island Packet 31 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1982 Island Packet 31 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1982 Island Packet 31 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1982 Island Packet 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1988 Contest 38 is 2.10m longer than the 1982 Island Packet 31. The 1988 Contest 38 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Island Packet 31, with an SA/D of 15.32 and 49.2 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Contest 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1982 Island Packet 31 has a comfort ratio of 25.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 41.5% for the 1982 Island Packet 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1982 Island Packet 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Island Packet 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Contest 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Contest 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS