1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison
1983 Pearson 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 | 1983 Pearson 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Pearson |
| Year | 1982–2005 | 1983–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Crealock | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) | 7.77 m (25.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1983 Pearson 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1983 Pearson 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 · 1983 Pearson 31