1982 S2 11.0A vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A1982 S2 11.0A
VS
Catalina 28Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 11.0ACatalina 28
General
ManufacturerS2Catalina
Year1982–19871998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 2.28m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 11.0A is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 11.0A · Catalina 28