Catalina 28 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison
Catalina 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 28 | 1996 Najad 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Najad |
| Year | 1998–2004 | 1996–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| Beam | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs) | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs) | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 33.5 m² (361 ft²) | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 28 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 2.86m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 167% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · 1996 Najad 380