1982 S2 11.0A vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1982 S2 11.0A 1982 S2 11.0A
VS
Hanse 315 Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 S2 11.0A Hanse 315
General
Manufacturer S2 Hanse
Year 1982–1987 2010–2016
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Arthur Edmunds judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,670 kg (12,500 lbs) 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.0 m² (592 ft²) 41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 11.0A
17.57
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 11.0A
40.00
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 11.0A
0.76
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 11.0A
18.18
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 11.0A and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 1.32m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 11.0A is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 S2 11.0A offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS