1982 S2 7.9 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.91986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerS2Pacific Seacraft
Year1982–19881986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1982 S2 7.9 is 0.28m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 S2 7.9 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25