1982 S2 7.9 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.9Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerS2Hunter
Year1982–19881991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerArthur EdmundsHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hunter 30 is 1.24m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The Hunter 30 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · Hunter 30