1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1978 C&C 24 1978 C&C 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Westerly Konsort 1978 C&C 24
General
Manufacturer Westerly C&C Yachts
Year 1982–1990 1978–1983
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK Canada
Designer Ed Dubois Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 9.50 m (31.2 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 6.10 m (20.0 ft)
Beam 3.10 m (10.2 ft) 2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft 1.07 m (3.5 ft) 1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)
Ballast 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs) 612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 34.0 m² (366 ft²) 24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 7 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1978 C&C 24
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1978 C&C 24
40.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1978 C&C 24
0.85
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1978 C&C 24
16.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 2.18m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 203% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS