1978 C&C 24 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison
1978 C&C 24
1972 Ranger 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1978 C&C 24 | 1972 Ranger 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | C&C Yachts | Ranger |
| Year | 1978–1983 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | USA |
| Designer | Cuthbertson & Cassian | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 7 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 19 L (5.0 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1978 C&C 24 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1978 C&C 24 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the 1978 C&C 24 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ranger 29 is 1.52m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1972 Ranger 29 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1978 C&C 24 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1978 C&C 24 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1978 C&C 24 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.