1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 vs 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 — Comparison

1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44
VS
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Pacific Seacraft
Year 1983–2000 1999–2007
Type Cutter Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer William Crealock William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 13.41 m (44.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 12,247 kg (27,000 lbs) 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 81.5 m² (877 ft²) 70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity 454 L (119.9 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Pacific Seacraft 44
15.58
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
15.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Pacific Seacraft 44
44.44
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
40.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Pacific Seacraft 44
0.67
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Pacific Seacraft 44
24.01
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
23.66

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 and 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 was penned by William Crealock. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 measures 13.41m (44.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 is 1.22m longer than the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40. The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.58 and 81.5 m² of sail area. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, with an SA/D of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 44.4% for the 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 and 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pacific Seacraft 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS