1983 Pearson 31 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Pearson 311979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerPearsonPearson
Year1983–19901979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL7.77 m (25.5 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Pearson 31
21.43
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Pearson 31 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1983 Pearson 31 was penned by William Shaw. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1983 Pearson 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 1.83m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Pearson 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1983 Pearson 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Pearson 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Pearson 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Pearson 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Pearson 31 · 1979 Pearson 37