1984 J/29 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison
Hunter 260
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 J/29 | Hunter 260 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Hunter |
| Year | 1984–1990 | 1998–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.99 m (29.5 ft) | 7.85 m (25.8 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 6.86 m (22.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) | 771 kg (1,700 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 41.1 m² (442 ft²) | 27.5 m² (296 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 J/29 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 J/29 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1984 J/29 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1984 J/29 measures 8.99m (29.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1984 J/29 is 1.14m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1984 J/29 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 J/29 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.97 and 41.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1984 J/29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 J/29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 45.8% for the 1984 J/29 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 J/29 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 J/29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 J/29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 J/29 · Hunter 260