2006 Hanse 350 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

2006 Hanse 350
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Hanse 350Hunter 260
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2006–20121998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.58 m (34.7 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL9.40 m (30.8 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.52 m (11.5 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.5 m² (597 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Hanse 350
17.47
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Hanse 350
29.31
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Hanse 350
0.78
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Hanse 350
17.52
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Hanse 350 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 2.73m longer than the Hunter 260. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 184% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Hanse 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Hanse 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · Hunter 260