2006 Hanse 350 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

2006 Hanse 350 2006 Hanse 350
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270 1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2006 Hanse 350 1978 Cape Dory 270
General
Manufacturer Hanse Cape Dory
Year 2006–2012 1978–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 10.58 m (34.7 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 9.40 m (30.8 ft) 6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam 3.52 m (11.5 ft) 2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.5 m² (597 ft²) 28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 75 L (19.8 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Hanse 350
17.47
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Hanse 350
29.31
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Hanse 350
0.78
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Hanse 350
17.52
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Hanse 350 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 2.35m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 113% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Hanse 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS