1984 Moody 33 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison

1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33
VS
1972 Ericson 321972 Ericson 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Moody 331972 Ericson 32
General
ManufacturerMoodyEricson
Year1984–19901972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerBill DixonBruce King
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.40 m (4.6 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)39.0 m² (420 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine20 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Moody 33
14.90
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Moody 33
40.38
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Moody 33
0.75
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Moody 33
21.57
1972 Ericson 32
21.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Moody 33 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1972 Ericson 32. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1972 Ericson 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ericson 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Moody 33 · 1972 Ericson 32