1984 Sabre 34 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1984 Sabre 34
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Sabre 341990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerSabreSabre
Year1984–19901990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Sabre 34
16.96
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Sabre 34
41.74
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Sabre 34
0.74
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Sabre 34
21.14
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Sabre 34 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Sabre 34 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1984 Sabre 34 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1984 Sabre 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1984 Sabre 34. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Sabre 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.96 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Sabre 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Sabre 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1984 Sabre 34 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Sabre 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Sabre 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Sabre 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Sabre 34 · 1990 Sabre 36